|
Home
All bulletin articles
The
Da Vinci Code: A Few Answers
Associate Pastor's Column
Sunday, May 21, 2006
In both
Catholic circles and general-public media circles this weekend has caused a
splash: The movie, The Da Vinci Code, has come out. What’s the big deal?
Why so much news and coverage? What do I as a Catholic need to know about this
work of the cinema? Today’s bulletin article will answer these questions.
Before
it was a movie, The Da Vinci Code was a book released by Doubleday in
2004. Since then it became a huge bestseller and was translated into dozens of
languages, I think more than forty. Before we start patting the author, Daniel
Brown, on the back for his huge success, however, we need to get something
clear: it is a serious and dishonest attack on the fundamental truths of
Catholicism.
Without
retelling the whole story, the basic thing goes like this: a Harvard professor
of symbolology (note: there is no department of Symbolology at Harvard)
accidentally stumbles upon evidence that the whole of Catholicism is a hoax,
hell-bent on deceiving the world in order to assert its authority, to keep women
down, and repress the goods of, shall we say, conjugal intimacy. The novel is
then a bit of an action novel, while the “hero,” with others risks his life to
uncover the “truth.”
What
does Leonardo Da Vinci have to do with all this conspiracy, fabricated by Mr.
Brown for his novel? Nothing in reality; yet in Mr. Brown’s imaginative book, he
claims that Da Vinci has a certain role of prominence in guarding and protecting
this secret. Da Vinci, nonetheless, reveals the secret to the world in some of
his works, including the painting of the Last Supper. In this painting, he
claims that the “John” character is not John but Mary Magdalene, and that she
carried Jesus’ child, a daughter.
In this
book, Dan Brown asserts points of raw paganism. He states clearly and directly
that Jesus Christ is not God; that Mary Magdalene should be worshipped as a
goddess; that the scriptures were formed by a pagan Roman emperor; that the
Church is really out to get everybody and over the centuries has even
perpetrated murder to keep these and many other lies secret. This is basically
what the serpent said to Eve in the Garden, that God did not love her, that he
was out to get her, and felt threatened by Adam and Eve as if they were
competition.
I have
met Catholics who have read this book and then asserted to me, “You should read
this book, it would open up your horizons.” Well yes, in fact I have read the
book, and the only horizon it opened to me was that of seeing more clearly the
well orchestrated assault on the Catholic faith in our own day and time. The
devil has always instigated persecutions in the Church, and in our day he is
evidently stirring up Christians against Christians, Catholics against
Catholics, to create a form of persecution not yet seen in history. This book
falls right into line with that strategy.
The
errors, of course, in Mr. Brown’s book are manifold. Some are theological, as
when he defines the “Immaculate Conception” as if it were the “virginal birth.”
Some are artistic, as when he asserts that there are frescos in Notre Dame in
Paris (there are none); or that there are 13 cups in Da Vinci’s last supper
painting, a point of proof for Brown of Da Vinci’s “code,” when there are in
fact only 12. He has mountains of historical errors, for example, regarding
Constantine and the early Church councils. The gravest of all are the religious
errors: the negation that Jesus Christ is God, that he rose from the dead, that
he gave us the Catholic Church, and so on.
To open
up new intellectual horizons, rather than read Dan Brown’s fantasy and errors
about how the Church is out to get everybody, I encourage all to read good
historical books full of seriously researched and documented evidence. Bihlmeyer
and Teuchle’s History of the Church, Laux’s Church History,
Johnson, Hannan and Dominica’s The Story of the Church, Crocker’s
Triumph, Belloc’s books, and other such books are full of honest work,
including the sadder parts of our Catholic history, and not full of false data
construed to prove a point.
Dan
Brown opens the book proposing to the reader at great length that everything in
the book is true and factual. Yet the evidence is against him, for the book is
riddled with errors, all of which are organized to form a harmonious attack on
the Catholic Church and on Christianity in general. You can find further
information on this book from my own web site, and from many others such as
Catholic Answers. These web sources will lead you even to entire books that
have been published to refute Brown’s false accusations.
No
children should read the book, due to some of its sexual content, some of it
even ritualistic. You, Gentle Reader, if you are an adult, should not read it
nor see the film unless you have a good reason (such as preparing for a formal
or informal debate), and have sufficient resources at hand to investigate and
uncover the many clever errors which are orchestrated to destroy the reader’s or
viewer’s faith.
Picture:
Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), The Last Supper, dining hall at the
Dominican convent of Sta Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy, 1498. |